Казанская наука №10 2011
Юридические науки 120002
M.Y. Zadorin
Northen (Arctic) federal university
named after M.V. Lomonosov
Arkhangelsk, zadorin@hotmail.com
INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF RUSSIA: COLLISION BETWEEN
DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL LAW
The article suggests the brief scientific and legal analysis of Russian
constitutional law on the rights of indigenous peoples. <...> The main aim is to show
the problematic issues and legal gaps inside the system of federal normative acts
in
comparison
with
international
legal
standards,
customs
and
recommendations from the authoritative bodies as the UN, ILO, CERD and etc. <...> The final provisions contain the concrete measures for the legal reform in
Russia, protecting indigenous communities. <...> The Russian Federation Constitution adopted by
national referendum on 12. 12. 1993 establishes in Article 69 the principle of
“guarantee the rights of the indigenous numerically small peoples” according to
international law [1]. <...> Unfortunately, this rule is rather declarative because
Russia is still not a party to ILO Convention 169 – one of the strongest
instruments in international law. <...> Russia has not ratified ILO Convention № 169,
primarily due to the presence of a certain kind of legal conflicts with Russian
law. <...> It requires the clause concerning the concept of “indigenous people” as
enshrined in the Article 1 of the Convention. <...> Reservations must also apply to the
Article 14 of the Convention. <...> It establishes that for the numerically small
peoples recognized the rights of ownership of the lands they traditionally
Казанская наука №10 2011
Юридические науки 120002
occupied. <...> However, the acting of Russian legislation does not fix for
numerically small peoples the land ownership rights to the territories of
traditional nature [2]. <...> Still, given the interest of the Russian Federation in the
convention and the convention’s position as the sole current instrument on
indigenous rights, it is interesting to apply its standards to the situation of the
numerically small peoples. <...> Unfortunately, Russia for this moment
had not yet signed the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous
Peoples [4]. <...> There are several key provisions in the relevant articles of the Constitution,
establishing rights and freedoms of the peoples residing in Russia: 1. equality of
rights and freedoms of man and citizen, regardless of their nationality, language
and culture (Article 19); 2. prohibiting <...>
Indigenous_Peoples_of Russia_Collision_Between_Domestic_and_International_Law__Kazan_Science_Press,_2011._—_№10._–_Pp.224–226._.pdf
Казанская наука №10 2011
M.Y. Zadorin
Northen (Arctic) federal university
named after M.V. Lomonosov
Arkhangelsk, zadorin@hotmail.com
INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF RUSSIA: COLLISION BETWEEN
DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL LAW
The article suggests the brief scientific and legal analysis of Russian
constitutional law on the rights of indigenous peoples. The main aim is to show
the problematic issues and legal gaps inside the system of federal normative acts
in comparison with international legal standards, customs and
recommendations from the authoritative bodies as the UN, ILO, CERD and etc.
The final provisions contain the concrete measures for the legal reform in
Russia, protecting indigenous communities.
Indigenous peoples, indigenous numerically small peoples, Russia.
With the collapse of the Soviet Union, the policy of assimilation, conducting
at the state level, had stopped. The Russian Federation Constitution adopted by
national referendum on 12. 12. 1993 establishes in Article 69 the principle of
“guarantee the rights of the indigenous numerically small peoples” according to
international law [1]. Unfortunately, this rule is rather declarative because
Russia is still not a party to ILO Convention 169 – one of the strongest
instruments in international law. Russia has not ratified ILO Convention № 169,
primarily due to the presence of a certain kind of legal conflicts with Russian
law. It requires the clause concerning the concept of “indigenous people” as
enshrined in the Article 1 of the Convention. Reservations must also apply to the
Article 14 of the Convention. It establishes that for the numerically small
peoples recognized the rights of ownership of the lands they traditionally
Юридические науки 120002
Стр.1
Казанская наука №10 2011
Юридические науки 120002
occupied. However, the acting of Russian legislation does not fix for
numerically small peoples the land ownership rights to the territories of
traditional nature [2]. Still, given the interest of the Russian Federation in the
convention and the convention’s position as the sole current instrument on
indigenous rights, it is interesting to apply its standards to the situation of the
numerically small peoples. Even if the convention does not become binding for
the Federation, it still constitutes a solid political tool to provide pressure for the
development of indigenous rights [3]. Unfortunately, Russia for this moment
had not yet signed the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous
Peoples [4].
There are several key provisions in the relevant articles of the Constitution,
establishing rights and freedoms of the peoples residing in Russia: 1. equality of
rights and freedoms of man and citizen, regardless of their nationality, language
and culture (Article 19); 2. prohibiting any form of restrictions on the rights of
citizens on ethnic grounds, as well as actions aimed at inciting ethnic hatred
(Article 26); guarantee the rights of “indigenous numerically small peoples” and
“numerically small ethnic societies” (Article 69, Article 72 (m)).
Article 69 leads the idea, that: “guarantee the rights … according to the
universally recognized principles…” If we look at the UN Declaration on
Indigenous Peoples Rights we can find those principles and basic rights: 1.
Right for self-determination (3, 4 Article); 2. Right for land resources (25-29
Article); 3. Principle of free and prejudicial agreement (10, 11, 19, 28, 30, 32
Article); 4. Principle of consultations (19, 32, 38 Article); 5. Right for restitution
(11, 28 Article); 6. Unity of the state (46 Article).
The last 6th principle is very important, because it means that no separatism
could exist in modern society [5], only, if the state government could give full
sovereignty for indigenous peoples [6]. Secession can be realized only in case in
“genocide” or systematic cruel human rights violations against indigenous
people. This is the doctrinal opinion which could be real international custom in
Стр.2