Журнал Сибирского федерального университета
Journal of Siberian Federal University
Гуманитарные науки
Humanities & Social Sciences
Редакционный совет:
академик РАН Е.А. Ваганов
академик РАН И.И. Гительзон
академик РАН А.Г. Дегерменджи
академик РАН В.Ф. Шабанов
чл.-корр. РАН, д-р физ.-мат. наук
В.Л. Миронов
чл.-корр. РАН, д-р техн. наук
Г.Л. Пашков
чл.-корр. РАН, д-р физ.-мат. наук
В.В. Шайдуров
чл.-корр. РАН, д-р физ.-мат. наук
В.В. Зуев
Editorial Advisory Board
Chairman
Eugene A. Vaganov
Members:
Josef J. Gitelzon
Vasily F. Shabanov
Andrey G. Degermendzhy
Valery L. Mironov
Gennady L. Pashkov
Vladimir V. Shaidurov
Vladimir V. Zuev
Editorial Board:
Editor-in-Chief
Mikhail I. Gladyshev
Founding Editor
Vladimir I. Kolmakov
Managing Editor
Olga F. Alexandrova
Executive Editor
for Humanities & Social Sciences
Natalia P. Koptseva
CONTENTS / СОДЕРЖАНИЕ
Ana Pujol Dahme,
Valentina A. Kononova and Liliana Tolchinsky
Triptych Approach: Cognitive, Social and Linguistic Perspectives
for Analyzing Academic Writing
– 943 –
Alexei V. Nesteruk
The Universe as a Construct: Epistemic Beliefs and Coherence
of Justification in Modern Cosmology
– 957 –
Sahar Farrahi Avval
The Toolkit a Translator Should Carry to Produce an Acceptable
Piece of Translation
– 1002 –
Ranjit Singh
Working of Indian Parliamentary Democracy in the 21st
an Appraisal
– 1007 –
Anatoly G. Anikevich and Elena P. Cheban
Democratic Constitutional Ideal and Problems of Political
Culture in Russia
– 1021 –
Yuri N. Belokopytov
General Organization Theory
– 1027 –
Natalia P. Koptseva
Orthodox Theology at Modern University: Main Approaches to
University Curriculum
– 1033 –
Компьютерная верстка Е.В. Гревцовой
Подписано в печать 23.07.2013 г. Формат 84x108/16. Усл. печ. л. 12,3.
Уч.-изд. л. 11,8. Бумага тип. Печать офсетная. Тираж 1000 экз. Заказ 2777.
Отпечатано в ПЦ БИК. 660041 Красноярск, пр. Свободный, 82а.
Century:
2013 6 (7)
Стр.1
Consulting Editors
for Humanities & Social Sciences:
Gershon M. Breslavs
Sergey V. Deviatkin
Sergey A. Drobyshevsky
Sergey M. Geraschenko
Oleg M. Gotlib
Boris I. Khasan
Galina A. Kopnina
Natalia V. Kovtun
Aleksandr A. Kronik
Pavel V. Mandryka
Boris V. Markov
Valentin G. Nemirovsky
Daniel V. Pivovarov
Andrey V. Smirnov
Viktor I. Suslov
Evgeniya V. Zander
Igor S. Pyzhev
Vladimir I. Suprun
Liudmila V. Kulikova
Olga G. Smolyaninova
Nicolai N. Petro
Dr. Suneel Kumar
Alexander V. Malko and Alexey Yu. Salomatin
The Universe as a Construct: Epistemic Beliefs and
Comparative Legal Policy and its Significanse for Legal Reform
– 1038 –
Konstantin K. Markov and Oksana O. Nikolaeva
Theoretical and Methodological Problems of Psychomotor
Qualities Formation in Volleyball
– 1043 –
Alexey E. Prokopovich and Oleg Yu. Lyutykh
Political Reforms in Russia and Improvement of Political System
in Russia at Beginning XXI Century
– 1057 –
Mikhail D. Severyanov and Larisa U. Anisimova
Abortion as a Means of Family Planning in Russia in the First
Quarter of the Twentieth Century
– 1066 –
Michael V. Lukyanenko,
Oleg A. Polezhaev and Natalya P. Churlyaeva
The Problems of Engineering Education and Graduates’
Development in the Workplace
– 1075 –
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ
ПИ № ФС77-28-723 от 29.06.2007 г.
Серия включена в «Перечень ведущих
рецензируемых научных журналов
и изданий, в которых должны
быть опубликованы основные научные
результаты диссертации на
соискание ученой степени доктора и
кандидата наук» (редакция 2010 г.)
Nukolai L. Shamne and Larisa N. Rebrina
Category of Memory: Principles of Linguistic Description
– 1085 –
Стр.2
Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 7 (2013 6) 943-956
~ ~ ~
УДК 81’42
Triptych Approach: Cognitive, Social
and Linguistic Perspectives
for Analyzing Academic Writing
Ana Pujol Dahmea
Valentina A. Kononovab
,
* and Liliana Tolchinskya
a
bSiberian Federal University
79 Svobodny, Krasnoyarsk, 660041 Russia
Received 20.12.2012, received in revised form 11.02.2013, accepted 07.06.2013
Academic writing has several functions and allowing the integration of their members into different
discourse communities is one of them. Students have to cope with the specialized language of their
discipline from the very fi rst steps of their educational path. The overall aim of this paper is to
review some studies on the research article; we will focus on argumentation frameworks to assess
their strengths and weaknesses for knowledge representation, and also two main approaches based
on discourse analysis. One of them studies the internal organization of texts by means of qualitative
methodologies. And the other approach focuses on language use; studies of this kind have been
quantitative on a large scale, based on corpus methodologies.
In doing so, fi rst, we highlight some gaps in the literature, and second, we attempt to show, that what
we call a triptych approach to the analysis of academic writing can shed some light on the structure
of the argument, the organizational pattern and the linguistic features of scientifi c texts written by
students.
Keywords: triptych approach, academic writing, research article, argumentation, moves, clusters.
Circe gave the potion to the sailors of Ulysses turning them into pigs,
who forgot their homeland, the ability to argue (Bordes, 2011).
Academic writing has several functions:
communicative, epistemic, dialogic, and
constructive
of
social
identity
and
social
integration. The communicative function of
writing allows people to discourse together,
informally or formally, through publishing
works in different media that persist over time
© Siberian Federal University. All rights reserved
* Corresponding author E-mail address: v.kononova@mail.ru
# 943 #
(Bazerman, 2005).
it
In an academic context
involves the transmission of knowledge to
other members of a specifi c community, e.g.
scientifi c community (Swales, 1990, 2004).
Academic writing also opens a problem
space functioning as a tool for learning more,
an epistemic tool. Writing transforms and builds
Universitat de Barcelona
585 Corts Catalanes, Gran Via de les,
08007 Barcelona, Spain
Стр.3