Журнал Сибирского федерального университета. Гуманитарные науки. Journal of Siberian Federal University, Humanities& Social Sciences №11 2013

Стр.1

Стр.2

Стр.3

Журнал Сибирского федерального университета Journal of Siberian Federal University Гуманитарные науки Humanities & Social Sciences Редакционный совет: академик РАН Е.А. Ваганов академик РАН И.И. Гительзон академик РАН А.Г. Дегерменджи академик РАН В.Ф. Шабанов чл.-корр. РАН, д-р физ.-мат. наук В.Л. Миронов чл.-корр. РАН, д-р техн. наук Г.Л. Пашков чл.-корр. РАН, д-р физ.-мат. наук В.В. Шайдуров чл.-корр. РАН, д-р физ.-мат. наук В.В. Зуев Editorial Advisory Board Chairman Eugene A. Vaganov Members: Josef J. Gitelzon Vasily F. Shabanov Andrey G. Degermendzhy Valery L. Mironov Gennady L. Pashkov Vladimir V. Shaidurov Vladimir V. Zuev Editorial Board: Editor-in-Chief Mikhail I. Gladyshev Founding Editor Vladimir I. Kolmakov Managing Editor Olga F. Alexandrova Executive Editor for Humanities & Social Sciences Natalia P. Koptseva CONTENTS / СОДЕРЖАНИЕ Thorsten Botz-Bornstein Philosophical Conceptions of Cultural Space in Russia and Japan: Comparing Nishida Kitaro and Semën Frank – 1555 – Øyvind Ravna The Legal Protection of the Rights and Culture of Indigenous SKmi People in Norway – 1575 – Elena G. Tareva and Anastasia S. Budnik Intercultural Communicative Competence as an Aim of Teaching Foreign Languages in Comprehensive School – 1592 – Gennadiy V. Boldyguin On The Meaning of the Word œPhilosophyB (on History of the Word) – 1599 – Vladislav Yu. Panchenko Rights Defence and Rights Protection Principles of the Legal Assistance in the Implementation of Rights and Legitimate Interests – 1610 – Alexander V. Malko Concept and Reality of Legal Policy in Modern Russia – 1614 – Kxenia V. Shubenkova œThe Soviet TraceB in the Development of General Theory of Law (A.S. Pigolkin’s Theoretical-Legal Concepts) – 1618 – Компьютерная верстка Е.В. Гревцовой Подписано в печать 23.11.2013 г. Формат 84x108/16. Усл. печ. л. 14,86. Уч.-изд. л. 14,36. Бумага тип. Печать офсетная. Тираж 1000 экз. Заказ 3483. Отпечатано в ПЦ БИК. 660041 Красноярск, пр. Свободный, 82а. 2013 6 (11)

Стр.1

Consulting Editors for Humanities & Social Sciences: Gershons Breslavs – International Institute of Applied Psychology, Latvia Sergey Devyatkin – Associate Professor, Novgorod State University Sergey Drobyshevsky – Professor, Siberian Federal University Oleg Gotlib – Associate Professor, Irkutsk State Linguistic University Boris Khasan – Professor, Siberian Federal University Galina Kopnina – Professor, Siberian Federal University Natalia Kovtoun – Professor, Siberian Federal University Alexander Kronik – Ph.D., LifeLook.Net, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland, USA Liudmila Kulikova – Professor, Siberian Federal University Pavel Mandryka – Associate Professor, Siberian Federal University Boris Markov – Professor, Saint-Petersburg State University Valentin Nemirovsky – Professor, Siberian Federal University Nicolai Petro – Political Science Professor, Rhode Island University, USA Daniel Pivovarov – Professor, Ural Federal University Igor Pyzhov – Associate Professor , Siberian Federal University Andrey Smirnov – Corresponding Member, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy RAS, Moscow Olga Smolyaninova – Professor, Siberian Federal University Vladimir Suprun – Professor, Institute of Philosophy and Law of SB RAS Viktor Suslov – Corresponding Member RAS, Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of SB RAS Eugeniya Zunder – Professor, Siberian Federal University Suneel Kumar – Assistant Professor, Department of Strategic and Regional Studies, University of Jammu Leonid S. Chernov The Laughter of the New Person, Modernization Problem: the Film œJolly FellowsB by G.V. Aleksandrov – 1623 – Marharyta S. Fabrykant Value of (Expla)nation: Testing Modernist Theories of Nationalism – 1656 – Yuriy B. Savelyev Multidimensional Modernity: Essential Features of Modern Society in Sociological Discourse – 1673 – Vladimir I. Ilyin and Veronika V. Romanenko Life Trajectories in the Space of Commercial Sex – 1692 – Dmitrii D. Nevirko Drug Situation in Modern Society at Russian and World Levels – 1702 – Zoya À. Vasilyeva Development Management on a Regional Level – 1710 – Sergey N. Sorokopud Hermeneutical Approaches in Social Philosophy and their Ability for the Analysis of Chinese Society – 1721 – Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ ПИ № ФС77-28-723 от 29.06.2007 г. Серия включена в «Перечень ведущих рецензируемых научных журналов и изданий, в которых должны быть опубликованы основные научные результаты диссертации на соискание ученой степени доктора и кандидата наук» (редакция 2010 г.)

Стр.2

Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 11 (2013 6) 1555-1574 ~ ~ ~ УДК 141(571.51)(520) Philosophical Conceptions of Cultural Space in Russia and Japan: Comparing Nishida Kitaro and Semën Frank Thorsten Botz-Bornstein* Gulf University for Science and Technology, PO Box 7207, 32093 Hawally, Kuwait Received 24.07.2013, received in revised form 31.07.2013, accepted 04.08.2013 Jean-Luc Nancy notes that the community, since it is no absolute subject (self, will, spirit), is by its nature not inscribed in any logic metaphysics. In spite of this, or indeed because of this, Western philosophy has persistently tried to interpret the community through precisely these metaphysical terms (Nancy, 1986, page 18, La Commonauté désoevrée, Christian Bourgeois, Paris). Some thoughts about Russian and Japanese notions of community and space will show that characteristics pointed out by Nancy and Kant are binding only for societies that function within a Western intellectual framework. I want to introduce and compare the thought of Nishida Kitaro. (1870 – 1945) and Semën L Frank (1877 – 1950), who develop the notions of basho and sobornost' as alternative philosophical concepts of space. Both Nishida and Frank attempt to overcome what they consider a typically `Western' idea of individual `I's as materialized `objects'. Procedures like Einfü h- lung or intuition are ineffi cient because all they do is to transform the other, from the point of view of the `I', into an object. Finally, for the Eurasianist, the state organization had at its center a personal god, and the `symphonic personality' of Russia-Eurasia represented a nonegoistic, communal consciousness. Keywods: Nishida Kitaro, Semyen Frank, Basho, sobornost’, philosophy of space, comparative Russian and Japanese philosophy. Introduction In the 1960s, Hugh Seton-Watson explained to all reformers of Africa and Asia that what is “more benefi cial invocation of Asianism or négritude” is the “the study of Russian and Japanese experience [of reform].”1 to them than the ritual As a matter of fact, Russia and Japan are not only successful reformers but also the fi rst “non-western” countries that develop a philosophy – in the “western” sense – of their own and on a larger scale. Still it seems that, in spite of this striking parallel, no comparative © Siberian Federal University. All rights reserved * Corresponding author E-mail address: thorstenbotz@hotmail.com # 1555 # research has been done on these two philosophical traditions. In general, both Japanese and Russian philosophies are engaged in the analysis of the relationship between faith and reason as well as in the critique of secularism. Concepts like “organicity,” “person,” and “totality” are central in both traditions and among the most popular philosophical themes discussed are refl ections on the problem of personalism and philosophical developments of “intuition.” Still, while studies on “Nishida and Heidegger” are numerous,

Стр.3